Comments on: Contents

By: Andi

Andi — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:22:09 +0000

buying this book is false – you can see all this without needing to generate additional self congratulatory cleverness

By: john johnson

john johnson — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:02:34 +0000

I don’t let any book, any dude, anybody tell me what is true or false. Got it?! We’re all a bunch of lowly humans with no more ability to see who or what created us or why than a sperm deposited on a bedsheet knows how it got there. Until you realize that, your’e as retarded as anybody else. Get off your high horse and quit thinking you’re smart, when all you’re doing is acting like a bunch of idiots. Humor is fine if it’s intelligent. This is lame.

By: Bunny Rodak

Bunny Rodak — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:22:43 +0000

I’d need to check with you here. Which is not one thing I usually do! I get pleasure from reading a put up that can make folks think. Additionally, thanks for permitting me to remark!

By: Xander

Xander — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:00:57 +0000

“Confucianism is false”

I object strongly! Confucianism isn’t a religion, it’s a philosophy. And even if you do class it as a religion, saying it is false is the same as saying “legalism is false” and deny the existence of laws (legalism is the opposite of Confucianism in justice systems).

Yes, yes, I know the book is a joke. But I just had to rant!

By: Andrew Segur

Andrew Segur — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:45:15 +0000

I’ve learned result-oriented things by means of your site.

By: slabesc rapid

slabesc rapid — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:59:22 +0000

I have learned new things as a result of your website.

By: intuitive web design

intuitive web design — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:28:32 +0000

Would it be smart to minor in creative writing and major in biochemistry?

By: Ally Thompson

Ally Thompson — Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:40:14 +0000

For the record, I’m a Christian Jedi- and my belief (as far as “the Force” is concerned) is that we all have “a universal power that radiates through us all” called Energy. It’s VERY scientific in nature, and we are continually unlocking it’s secrets. How much you can use it? Well, I don’t adhere to telekinetic abilities-but it MAY be possible (as I also do not put anything past the universe after the double slit experiment). As to God, well you can’t disprove His existance, nor can you really prove it-you just have to have faith (otherwise it would be a moot point to believe in anything).

By: hgfhf hfhfh

hgfhf hfhfh — Sun, 29 May 2011 00:55:00 +0000

than 2,500

By: leon

leon — Thu, 12 May 2011 02:48:59 +0000

Addiction to empty forms is false. Reliance on naive materialism is false. Casting aspersions broadly on so many, with so little evidence is false. Appeals to intellectual superiority are false. Repetition of peremptory judgment is false. Reinforcing negative stereotypes with ad hominem statements is false. Reifying your own privilege by using other people to elevate your position is false. Scoring pseudointellectual points by condeming other people for their magical thinking is false. What isn’t false: Evidence is not false, but nor is it true. Belief is a psychological state of mind and to fall into dialectics of what is, and what isn’t, leads to rigid views, to reifying reactions into rules. “God” is nothing more than a concept of a shared space, of a broader sense of what *is*, existentially. What religions have done to the concept is flawed. Siddhartha Gotama examined this more than 2,500 years ago. He was an atheist. Get over yourself.